90+ Countries / 200+ Routes

Global Server Routes

Choose an exit based on your destination, task, and route structure—not just city distance. QEvpn offers IEPL dedicated, transit, and direct routes for everyday browsing, streaming, AI tools, gaming, and cross-border work.

Start Free View Plans
  • Unlimited devices
  • 30-day refunds
  • No email address required
Regional Index

Representative Cities & Route Types

The table below illustrates regional coverage and common route structures, highlighting representative entry points among 90+ countries / 200+ routes. Available options in the client depend on the service configuration; use the route names shown in your account when choosing.

QEvpn Representative Server Routes
Country City Route Type Streaming Support
Asia-Pacific
🇯🇵Japan Tokyo IEPL Dedicated Supported
🇯🇵Japan Osaka Transit Supported
🇸🇬Singapore Singapore IEPL Dedicated Supported
🇰🇷South Korea Seoul Transit Supported
🇲🇾Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Direct Region matching required
🇹🇭Thailand Bangkok Direct Region matching required
🇮🇳India Mumbai Transit Region matching required
🇮🇩Indonesia Jakarta Direct Region matching required
North America
🇺🇸United States Los Angeles IEPL Dedicated Supported
🇺🇸United States Seattle Transit Supported
🇺🇸United States New York Transit Supported
🇨🇦Canada Toronto Direct Supported
Europe
🇬🇧United Kingdom London IEPL Dedicated Supported
🇩🇪Germany Frankfurt Transit Supported
🇫🇷France Paris Transit Supported
🇳🇱Netherlands Amsterdam Direct Supported
🇸🇪Sweden Stockholm Direct Region matching required
🇮🇹Italy Milan Direct Region matching required
Other Regions
🇦🇺Australia Sydney Transit Supported
🇳🇿New Zealand Auckland Direct Region matching required
🇧🇷Brazil São Paulo Direct Supported
🇿🇦South Africa Johannesburg Direct Region matching required
Route Structure

IEPL Dedicated, Transit, and Direct

Route types describe the path from your local entry point to the exit in the target region. They can affect peak-hour stability, long-distance performance, and service costs, but the label itself is not a universal speed ranking.

IEPL

IEPL Dedicated: More Control Over Cross-Border Backbone Paths

IEPL dedicated routes generally connect to the target region through relatively fixed entry points and cross-border backbone paths, reducing unpredictable routing changes on the public internet. Their value lies in connection continuity and path control, not just a peak speed from a single test. For remote work, cloud documents, continuous synchronization, developer terminal requests, and session-based tasks, a stable path is often more important than short-term speed.

These routes typically require more resources and maintenance, making them a better fit for users sensitive to interruptions, those with fixed working hours, or anyone seeking fewer route changes. When the target service is in Japan, Singapore, the United States, or Europe, choose an exit in the same region first, then compare dedicated and transit routes; do not ignore the destination region based solely on the “dedicated” label.

RELAY

Transit: A Balance Between Coverage and Cost

A transit route first connects to an access point that is closer or better suited to the current network, then uses an intermediate network to reach the target region. This can avoid some poor public-internet routes while allowing different access environments to share a more stable international exit. Transit does not automatically mean a slower path; the key factors are the entry point, backbone handoff, and target exit.

Everyday browsing, high-definition video, AI tools, and general office work can usually start with transit routes. They offer a practical balance of coverage, cost, and stability, and work well as an alternative to dedicated routes. When the local network changes, different transit entry points to the same region may perform differently, so keeping several candidates is more useful than relying on one route indefinitely.

DIRECT

Direct: A Simpler Path, More Dependent on the Local Network

Direct routes connect from the current network straight to an exit in the target region, with fewer intermediate routing steps and greater flexibility across regions. They suit ordinary web access, occasional use, regional testing, and situations where the public route near the target city is already good. For distant regions, physical distance and carrier routing still affect the experience.

Direct routes generally cost less to operate, but are more exposed to public-network congestion and routing changes during peak hours. Do not judge by city name alone; check whether common services can reliably complete login, loading, and sustained transfers. If direct access fluctuates on the current network, switch to transit or IEPL dedicated in the same region instead of immediately changing to a completely different country.

Route Selection

Read the Region First, Then the Path

Route names are decision cues. The usual order is to identify where the target service is located, choose the corresponding region, then select a route type based on your needs for continuity and cost.

Country and City Indicate the Exit Location

The country and city in the table indicate the approximate network exit region, not where the user must be located. For region-restricted content or services, the exit region is usually more important than the entry city. If a service offers multiple regions, prioritize an exit matching the account region, data center, or content library to avoid repeated switching caused by a mismatch.

Route Type Represents the Transport Structure

IEPL dedicated, transit, and direct describe how traffic is organized from access point to exit. Dedicated routes emphasize path control, transit emphasizes routing balance, and direct emphasizes a simple structure. None is universally better; the same route can perform differently across access networks, times, and target services.

Streaming Access Still Requires Account-Region Matching

Streaming platforms commonly consider the exit region, account details, content licensing, and their own rules together. After choosing a route marked as supported, if the library still differs from expectations, confirm the account and target content regions first, then switch entry points within the same region. Frequent jumps between regions can make diagnosis harder.

The Nearest City Is Not Always the Best Choice

A nearby exit usually offers a shorter physical path, but the target website’s data center may be elsewhere. For international sites, use a nearby city as a starting point; if page resources remain slow, try a route closer to the target service’s data center. Choose based on the complete task, not map distance alone.

Use-Case Index

Choose Routes by the Task

Different tasks need different route characteristics. Web browsing depends on sustained responsiveness, video on long-running transfers, AI tools and office systems on session continuity, and gaming on consistent routing. Clarifying the task first reduces pointless route switching.

BROWSE

Everyday Browsing and International Websites

Start with a nearby transit or direct route, then use familiar websites to test search, login, image loading, and file retrieval. Everyday browsing does not require the higher-cost path from the outset; completing the full workflow is more informative than testing homepage load speed alone.

If several websites pause while loading, keep the target region unchanged and switch to a transit entry point in the same region. If only one site behaves abnormally, the cause is more likely related to that service’s region or status.

STREAM

Streaming and Long-Form Playback

Confirm the platform’s relevant region first, then choose an exit marked for streaming support. During playback, check whether quality remains stable, seeking resumes loading, and longer viewing sessions avoid repeated reconnects.

If the region is recognized correctly but playback is inconsistent, first switch within the same region from direct to transit or IEPL dedicated. This preserves the content-library region while changing the network path, keeping regional and transport issues separate.

AI

AI Tools and Developer Services

AI chats, code completion, command-line requests, and cloud development environments often rely on persistent sessions. Prefer a transit or IEPL dedicated route in the target service’s region, and verify that login, generation, follow-up prompts, and file interactions all complete successfully.

If a page opens but generation is interrupted, do not assume the site itself is unreachable. Keep the exit region unchanged, switch the route structure, and establish a new session. In development workflows, terminals, editors, and browsers should also follow consistent connection rules to reduce differences caused by separate routing.

GAME

Gaming and Interactive Connections

Gaming depends more on stable routing and continuous interaction; the nearest city on a map may not correspond to the game server. Confirm the game region first, then choose an entry in the same or a nearby region and test the entire login, matchmaking, and live-game process.

International routes primarily address path selection, so web-browsing impressions should not be applied directly to gaming. If direct access fluctuates, try transit in the same region; if the target game region is clear and disconnections are frequent, consider the more controllable path of an IEPL dedicated route.

WORK

Cross-Border Work, Meetings, and Cloud Collaboration

Workflows often combine web systems, cloud documents, code repositories, meetings, and file synchronization. Choose based on the most sensitive task rather than testing ordinary web pages alone: a page loading normally does not guarantee a stable long meeting or sync session. Prefer a transit or IEPL dedicated route matching the enterprise service’s data-center region, and test login, permissions, file read/write, and meeting connectivity before work begins.

When switching between Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Linux, the same subscription can be used on unlimited devices. Desktops suit office work, development, and large-screen viewing; mobile devices suit travel and everyday access; Linux fits development environments. Each device can select a route for its own network, so the same exit is not required. Recording a primary region and backup route is more efficient than choosing from the full list each time.

Connection Strategy

When to Switch Routes

Switch with a clear objective: adjust the exit region, change the transport structure, or determine whether the issue is local. Change only one condition at a time to identify what caused the difference.

Keep the Target Region Unchanged First

When a familiar website or app becomes unstable, switch first between routes in the same country or nearby cities. This keeps the region visible to the service unchanged and makes it easier to compare direct, transit, and IEPL dedicated routes. Changing countries immediately alters both regional detection and the network path, making the real cause difficult to identify.

Then Check the Local Access Environment

Home, office, and public networks may use different exit routes. The same route can perform differently across access environments. Reconnect to the current network, confirm that ordinary domestic websites work normally, then return to a backup entry point in the same region. Observe mobile and desktop devices separately rather than generalizing from one device.

Judge by Task Completion

A web task should complete login and page navigation; streaming should sustain playback; AI tools should support continuous interaction; office work should complete document sync or meeting connections. Opening a homepage once only confirms the initial connection, not the full session. Whether the task finishes successfully is a more useful standard for everyday experience.

Keep Primary and Backup Routes

Once you find a suitable route, record its target region, route type, and appropriate tasks, while keeping another path in the same region as a backup. Use the primary route for stable conditions and the backup when the access network or target service changes. This is more flexible than relying on one city and better reflects the value of broad route coverage.

Coverage

Route Coverage and Multi-Device Use

QEvpn covers 90+ countries / 200+ routes, with regional placement designed for different target services, access networks, and tasks. Coverage is not only about offering more city names; it provides multiple paths within a target region and nearby alternatives for cross-region access.

Supported platforms include Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux, and each subscription works on unlimited devices. Desktops suit office work, development, and large-screen viewing; mobile devices suit travel and everyday access; Linux fits development environments. Devices can choose routes independently for their networks rather than being forced to use the same exit.

No email address is required when creating an account; a username and password are enough to get started. After login, the user panel provides subscription and client entry points; the marketing pages do not provide static installers or subscription URLs. To compare traffic and pricing, visit the plans page for monthly subscriptions and permanent, non-expiring traffic packages.

Start Free View Plans
GLOBAL ROUTES Regional Entry Points
Asia-Pacific

Suitable for content, cloud services, and office systems in Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and nearby regions.

North America

Representative cities across the United States and Canada, suited to North American content platforms, AI tools, and developer services.

Europe

International route options across the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, and other European regions.

Other Regions

Representative cities in Australia, New Zealand, South America, and Africa for regional matching and remote access.